ZZZ Center for Human Rights & Constitutional Law
       

     

photo

Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law



"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those  

            who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."       
- Franklin D. Roosevelt                          

   photo    photo

HOME        PROJECTS       SUPPORT SERVICES        LAW & POLICY        STAFF        VOLUNTEER        DONATE      CONTACT US

Welcome to the young_girlCenter for Human Rights & Constitutional Law. The Center is a non-profit, public interest legal foundation dedicated to furthering and protecting the civil, constitutional, and human rights of immigrants, refugees, children, prisoners, and the poor.

Since its incorporation in 1980, under the leadership of a board of directors comprising civil rights attorneys, community advocates and religious leaders, the Center has provided a wide range of legal services to vulnerable low-income victims of human and civil rights violations and technical support and training to hundreds of legal aid attorneys and paralegals in the areas of immigration law, constitutional law, and complex and class action litigation.

The Center has achieved major victories in numerous major cases in the courts of the United States and before international bodies that have directly benefited hundreds of thousands of disadvantaged persons.

button_newsfeed
icon_solitaryconfinement
icon_homelessness
icon_immigrantchildren
icon_daca
facebook-link
twitter-link
supportus-link

UPDATES

  • What Hillary Clinton Can Do To Show that Immigrant Families Matter  - May 1, 2016

Bill Clinton dealt a major setback to rational immigration policy in 1996 when he signed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act for the first time in history adopting "bars" that would block millions of immigrants from legalizing their status even though they qualified for immigrant visas through their U.S. citizen or lawful resident spouses, parents or children.

This law now accounts for about two million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S. with Government-issued "approved" visa petitions, but unable to legalize their status. Hillary Clinton could endorse an easy solution to legalize these immigrants with no change in existing law.

Read the full analysis by the Center’s Executive Director, Peter Schey, here.

Before walking out of jail a free man in February, Albert Woodfox spent 43 years almost without pause in an isolation cell, becoming the longest standing solitary confinement prisoner in America. He had no view of the sky from inside his 6ft by 9ft concrete box, no human contact, and taking a walk meant pacing from one end of the cell to the other and back again.

As a member of the “Angola Three” – former Black Panther activists who were all subject to decades of solitary confinement in Louisiana’s notorious Angola prison – Woodfox was put into CCR ostensibly for the murder of a prison guard, for which he has always insisted he was framed. His conviction was twice overturned by a federal court on the grounds that it was unconstitutional, and he walked out of custody an innocent man.

Read the full story here.

  • CHRCL files International Law Petition Denouncing U.S. Support for Mexico’s “Plan Fontera Sur” - April 15, 2016

     

    Yesterday, April 14, over 35 faith-based groups and human rights organizations filed a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights of the Organization of American States denouncing the joint campaign of the United States and Mexico--the infamous Plan Frontera Sur--to interdict and summarily deport persons fleeing rampant violence in Central America's "northern triangle": Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.

    The Petition, Adolescentes en el Camino, et al. (United States and Mexico), Case P-652-16, marshals extensive evidence that the two governments are deporting tens of thousands of men, women and children to jurisdictions in which they run a clear risk of persecution and death, in violation of the long-standing international prohibition against refoulement of refugees. Petitioners ask the Inter-American Commission to rule, inter alia, that interdicted refugees are entitled to a full and fair process by which their eligibility for international protection in Mexico may be determined.


    The Petition is available for viewing and downloading here.

Israeli security forces are abusing Palestinian children detained in the West Bank. The number of Palestinian children arrested by Israeli forces has more than doubled since October 2015. Interviews with children who have been detained, video footage, and reports from lawyers reveal that Israeli security forces are using unnecessary force in arresting and detaining children, in some cases beating them, and holding them in unsafe and abusive conditions.

 

Read more here.

  • Judge Strikes Down Scott Walker’s ‘Right To Work’ Law - April 9, 2016

      

    A judge declared late Friday that Wisconsin’s controversial “right-to-work” law violated the state’s constitution. The law had become a centerpiece in the state’s contentious battles over the role of unions and the conservative war on labor unions.

     

    “Right-to-work” laws prevent unions from reaching agreements with employer that require all workers, not just union members, to pay union dues. So a worker can opt out of paying union fees even if they are represented by one in their workplace — meaning they gain the benefits of being in a union (such as collective bargaining for higher wages) without paying to support such efforts.

     

    Read more here.

  • Federal Court Blocks Mississippi 'Unconstitutional' Ban On Gay Adoptions - March 31, 2016

    A federal judge has just blocked Mississippi's ban on gay people and same-sex couples adopting children. U.S. District Judge Daniel P. Jordan III, citing the Supreme Court's Obergefell decision, ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and barred the Mississippi Department of Human Services and its director from enforcing that ban.

    Judge Jordan wrote that it seems "highly unlikely that the same court that held a state cannot ban gay marriage because it would deny benefits—expressly including the right to adopt—would then conclude that married gay couples can be denied that very same benefit."

    Read more here.

  • The Center’s General Counsel, Carlos Holguin, featured in ABA Journal - February 1, 2016

     

    At first, Carlos Holguín was skeptical. A well-known actor in Hollywood called seeking help for his housekeeper's daughter after immigration authorities arrested and detained the girl for being in the country illegally.

     

    That wasn’t unusual. Holguín represented such people often as an attorney at the Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law. And it was 1984, a time when migrants from El Salvador, like this 15-year-old girl, were coming to the U.S. in droves to escape their country’s brutal civil war. What was unusual was the caller’s concern: The Immigration and Naturalization Service wouldn’t release the girl to anyone but a parent or guardian. The problem was that parents without legal status, like the girl’s mother, would be arrested and deported if they came for their children. Civil rights attorneys were starting to believe the policy’s real purpose was to use the kids as bait.

     

    For the full article follow this link.

  • Obama bans solitary confinement for juveniles in federal prisons - January 2016

     

     

    In 2010, a 16-year-old named Kalief Browder from the Bronx was accused of stealing a backpack. He was sent to Rikers Island to await trial, where he reportedly endured unspeakable violence at the hands of inmates and guards — and spent nearly two years in solitary confinement.

     

    In 2013, Kalief was released, having never stood trial. He completed a successful semester at Bronx Community College. But life was a constant struggle to recover from the trauma of being locked up alone for 23 hours a day. One Saturday, he committed suicide at home. He was just 22 years old.

     

    In January 2016 President Obama announced a ban on solitary confinement for juvenile offenders in the federal prison system, saying the practice is overused and has the potential for devastating psychological consequences.

     

    Read more here.

  • Obama’s deportation raids to continue, despite outcry - January 8, 2016

     

    ATLANTA — It is quiet now, a little too quiet, along the suburban avenues lined with Salvadoran pupusa shops and Guatemalan bakeries. The stores are emptier than usual, and some of the waitresses and clerks are not showing up at work. Everyone seems to know about last weekend’s raids, when immigration agents pounded on doors before dawn and took mothers and children away.

    The deportations have brought the divisive issue of illegal immigration once again to the political forefront. The raids were the first large-scale effort to deport families who had fled violence and poverty in Central America in 2014 and 2015. More than 100,000 families with adults and children crossed the southwestern border.

     

    Read the full story here.

  • How For-Profit Companies Are Driving Immigration Detention Policies - December 18, 2015

Surprisingly, the largest detention and supervised release program in the country is not operated by the U.S. Department of Justice, or DOJ, but by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, or DHS, which oversees the nation’s immigration detention program. According to the DOJ, its Federal Bureau of Prisons had nearly 200,000 individuals in custody as of December 2015. On the other hand, DHS’s immigration detention program detains around 400,000 people each year.

The immigration detention system has grown exponentially over the past 20 years from fewer than 7,500 beds in 1995 to the 34,000 beds today. These beds are spread across a network of more than 250 detention facilities nationwide, including facilities run by for-profit corporations. A key factor underlying the explosion in the number of immigrants in custody is the expanded role of for-profit prison companies in the U.S. immigration detention system.

Read more here.

A full report on the subject by the Center for American Progress can be read here.

  • DAPA/Expanded DACA Programs Blocked: A New Strategy for President Obama and immigrant communities - November 11, 2015 

There are several critically important steps President Obama could take to better protect immigrants and at the same time address head-on the federal court's blocking of his efforts at immigration reform.

Implementation of DAPA and expanded DACA has been blocked by the U.S. District Court and now by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. While the White House has vowed to appeal further to the U.S. Supreme Court, as explained below, the appeal will have little chance of success. Simply put, the Supreme Court is likely to agree that the DAPA/ Expanded DACA program should have been issued as formal regulations, not just as a "policy" of the Department of Homeland Security. President Obama should promptly issue a policy or adopt regulations allowing all immigrants eligible for family or employment-based visas under existing law to apply for and be granted "advance parole" (permission to travel abroad and return to the U.S. through a port of entry) for personal or business purposes.

This is a sensible “border enforcement” proposal. It is well known that undocumented immigrants, including immigrants with pending or approved visa applications, who are playing by the rules and are “in the system,” travel abroad to see family and for other personal reasons. When they return to their residences in the U.S., they do so without inspection, crossing mountains and deserts with the help of human smugglers. The journey is dangerous and diverts the limited resources of the Customs and Border Protection agency (CBP). Allowing these immigrants to return through normal ports of entry can be accomplished with “advance parole.” This would remove the dangers of returning illegally and preserve CBP’s limited enforcement resources. Simply put, these immigrants would return through a normal inspection process rather than traveling across the Southern border entering with the help of human traffickers.

After returning to the U.S. with regular border inspections, thousands of immigrants with already approved visa petitions would immediately become eligible to apply for lawful permanent status. These immigrants cannot adjust their status now solely because of their unlawful initial entries many years ago. We urge advocates to begin providing assistance to visa applicants and those with approved visas to apply for "advance parole." The Center is available to assist and guide advocates. We also urge advocacy groups to call on President Obama to authorize DHS to grant advance parole so these immigrants can visit their families, return to the U.S. with inspection, and then apply for lawful permanent resident status.

Read the full analysis by Peter Schey, Director, Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law.
Email advanceparole@centerforhumanrights.org for technical support.

Read the 5th Circuit's decision in Texas v. United States here

"Comprehensive White House Immigration Reform: President Obama is Missing the Boat and Leaving Millions of Immigrants Stranded" available to download here.
  • Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law launches “Advance Parole” effort to legalize 1.5 million immigrants. - November 1, 2015

The Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law is initiating discussions, trainings and advocacy aimed at securing “advance parole” for immigrants “in the system” who have pending or approved visa petitions. An analysis of the benefits of such a program and its benefits may be read/downloaded at this link. In a nutshell, the Congress and Administration have obviously failed to come close to passing comprehensive immigration reform and it is highly unlikely to do so soon. The consensus for rational reform measures is not present, and, in any event, neither the Congress nor the Administration have even studied the migration issue in any comprehensive way as was done in 1985-86 to lay the foundation for smart immigration reform. In fact, the only real players right now in the immigration “reform” debate are major corporations wheeling and dealing to rake in profits in various enforcement capacities. President Obama, in a last ditch effort to achieve something significant, finally issued the DAPA program promising over a million undocumented immigrants temporary work permits. The DAPA program was quickly blocked by the federal courts because it does not appear to leave sufficient discretion in the hands of officers to grant or deny applications and it was not issued as a formal regulation to protect immigrants but merely as a “policy” subject to change at any time by any Administration. It was clear from the beginning that these flaws in the program could result in the courts blocking the program, the Administration has refused to modify the program, and its therefore now blocked by the court of appeals and its future very uncertain. However, there is one major action the immigrants, their advocates and the White House and DHS could now take to benefit one to two million immigrants while engaging in smart border enforcement.

 

Read more about “Advance Parole” here

  • Congressman: ‘No Way’ Comprehensive Immigration Reform Will Happen, Even After Obama - October 30, 2015

It’s been widely reported that newly-elected Speaker of the House Paul Ryan (R-WI) won’t bring immigration reform legislation to the House floor while President Obama remains in office. What’s been mentioned less is what will happen when Obama is gone.


Read more at http://thinkprogress.org/immigration/2015/10/30/3717991/paul-ryan-immigration-reform-freedom-caucus/
  • Rodriguez v. Robbins 9th Circuit Opinion - October 28, 2015

Today the 9th Circuit Court of appeals issued a landmark decision for the rights of detained immigrants. The ruling came as result of a class action suit filed on behalf of hundreds of immigrants held in Southern California by the federal government at detention facilities that operate almost seamlessly like prisons. According to Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw, detainees “are typically housed in shared cells with no privacy and limited access to larger spaces or the outdoors.”

 

In their decision of Rodriguez v Robbins the court ruled that immigrants held in civil detention facilities must be given bond hearings every six months. This is in order to shorten the existing wait time for immigrants in detention. Before this order, it is estimated that half of all detainees would spend at least a year in these centers, with a small percentage spending over two years there.

 

Those challenging their detention were usually able to prevail but in the process they were typically subject to years of confinement as a result. These bond hearings are aimed at preventing such an occurrence.

 

Read the full decision here: http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/10/28/13-56706.pdf

  • Immigrant family detention centers are prison-like, critics say, despite order to improve - October 23, 2015

Today was the deadline for the federal government to comply with Judge Dolly Gee’s order requiring they improve the conditions and shorten the waiting time that families and children are forced to spend in detention facilities . The order stems from finding that the Obama administration was blatantly disregarding the terms of the 1997 settlement of Flores v. Meese.

 

While the spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, Jennifer Elzea, alleges that they have worked diligently to ensure DHS is in compliance with the order, no evidence has been submitted to the courts and the number of detainees housed this last month are well over what they were when Judge Gee first ruled her order.

 

Find out more about the deadline and what it means at http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-immigration-family-detention-20151020-story.html

  • Pennsylvania Warns Family Immigrant Detention Center: Change Policies Or Lose Your License - October 23, 2015

One of the three facilities that detains immigrant families in the United States will not be allowed to expand and could lose its license to operate from the state of Pennsylvania -- a major win for the advocacy groups aiming to shut down family detention.

 

Read more at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/family-immigrant-detention-berks_562a8fe6e4b0443bb563fcbd

  • US Commission on Civil Rights REPORT- Liberty and Justice for All: The State of Civil Rights at Immigration Detention Facilities - September 2015

This Statutory Enforcement Report examines the civil rights and constitutional concerns that the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) “raised with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its component [agencies] over the treatment of adult and minor [immigrant] detainees [who are being] held under federal law in detention centers across the country.”1 Specifically, this report analyzes the constitutional issues surrounding DHS’s treatment of detained immigrants as well as other selected federal agencies’ efforts to comply with established Performance Based National Detention Standards (PBNDS), 2 the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA),3 and the federal standards for detaining unaccompanied minor children.

 

See more at http://www.usccr.gov/pubs/Statutory_Enforcement_Report2015.pdf

  • Jeb Bush on immigration: My plan is 'dignified' - September 21, 2015

Jeb Bush admitted Monday his views on immigration may not be "mainstream" in the Republican Party. But he praised the "vitality" of a multicultural society as other GOP presidential candidates find themselves in trouble over comments about minorities.

"If we embrace a set of shared values, then it shouldn't matter if you have a 'z' at the end of your name, or your accent might be different, 'cause guess what? There are people in this country, that have accents different from mine and mine's different from theirs. It doesn't matter," Bush said to a roomful of Hispanics.

Read more at http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/21/politics/jeb-bush-immigration-election/

  • Judge orders prompt release of immigrant children from detention - August 22, 2015

Earlier this month, Judge Dolly Gee ruled that the Department of Homeland Security was in violation of the 1997 Flores settlement. She agreed with the earlier settlement terms that children should not be held for more than 72 hours unless they are a significant flight risk or danger to themselves and others.

 

In her 15-page order, Judge Gee chastised government officials for reiterating the same arguments they had raised in earlier briefings and which she had already rejected. She has given them until October 23rd to comply with her oreder.